There are five principles that guide my pastoral leadership in the use and application of the 1 Corinthians 12 manifestation gifts.
#1 -DEMONSTRATION - Model the use of the gifts personally. Insist on genuine traceable results. Celebrate miracles publicly.
Since I spent some time on this first principle in the last post, I will let these summary statements speak for themselves.
#2 - INSTRUCTION - Teach the believer what the gifts are, why they are important for daily life and ministry, and how they should be used.
Spiritual Gifts = Divine explosions of Holy Spirit power to meet human need through the life of a yielded believer. These nine manifestations are available to every believer at all times as needs arise. We should live in anticipation of what God will do through us.
Their Use = We should use these gifts very naturally. When in a public worship gathering, we should use them like we would in any other public place. Worship services are practice sessions for real life. So use them like you would use them in the Mall, or the office...with the same tone and approach.
Avoid sounding spooky, speaking in old English, shouting, etc. Offer the gift in humility and in a way that can be best received by others.
#3 - EXPLANATION - I work hard to explain any expressiveness that occurs in our services.
When we raise our hands, I explain why for the benefit of those who are new. I want to act as a cultural interpreter for those who are not familiar with the way we interact with God. Like a language interpreter puts concepts from one language into words of another, so I want to explain what is happening for those who don't understand.
This is especially important in the use of the gifts. I do a little talk before their use and after. I try to make it as safe and normal as possible. I don't apologize for their use. I am passionate about it. I am excited for what God is doing. But I also am aware of how different this entire experience can be for guests. So I try to bring them along slowly in their experience.
Jack Hayford is someone who models this well. He leads people into a full experience and he explains everything along the way.
#4 - INCLUSION - Probably the most radical and yet the most important step that we have taken is a move to an inclusive approach in the use of the gifts. What does that mean?
Classical Pentecostal style is more of an interruptive style. When a person feels prompted to use a gift, they shout it out from their seat and interrupt the moment.
This is probably the most unusual thing for people who are not used to our church-culture. There is no other place in our current Western culture where a person shouts out informally in the middle of a public meeting. There is nothing wrong with this style. In many cases, however, it is culturally foreign to most visitors.
So we use an inclusive style. When a person is prompted to use a gift, they tell one of our pastoral leaders. We then evaluate whether the gift is something to be shared only with the leadership or whether it is to be immediately shared with the church.
When it is shared, I pastor the moment. I tell people what is about to happen. I allow the person to participate in the use of the gift. We bring the person up onto the platform (or I share it on their behalf). We use the microphone. Then I teach people what to do with what they have heard.
This one step has done so much to make people feel safe in bringing their friends to church. It has also opened the doors for the 'shy' in my congregation to feel the courage to be used.
#5 - COMPASSION - the entire purpose of the gifts is to encourage others.
We need the gifts because there are needs present that we cannot meet with Divine explosions of Holy Spirit power. So we eagerly pursue the gifts so the sick people can receive a gift of healing, and discouraged people a gift of faith, and confused people a word of wisdom.
In fact, we try to design prayer moments our services that are focused on individual needs. We tell our people that if they bring a person with a need, we will have the entire church pray for them specifically.
When answers to prayer happen, we celebrate what God is doing in the lives of those from whom we prayed.
These five principles help to guide me in our practice. I hope they are helpful to you.
What practical steps have you taken to create the balance of relevance and power?
Thursday, October 11, 2007
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
7 comments:
Under Jeff Leake's recent post entitled Relevance vs. Power, he writes;" Model the use of the gifts personally. Insist on genuine traceable results. Celebrate miracles publicly" It's the last part of Jeff's post that really gets me....the idea that he puts forth that miracles are in fact commonplace among us. I wish that it were true,Jeff wishes that it were true, but unfortunately, it is'nt so. A "miracle" is an event in nature, so extrodinary in itself and so coinciding with the prophecy or command of a religious teacher or leader, as to fully warrant the conviction, on the part of those who witness it, that God has wrought it with the design of certifying that this teacher or leader has been commissioned by him. (Augustus Strong, Systematic Theology) Now that definition would certainly help us toss out the Benny Hinn variety healing show and slight of hand con artists that are deceiving the Church today. I'd like to know how Jeff publicly celebrates the miracles at his Church....If they fit that definition, they will not need your help to celebrate.John MacArthur(I know that he's a cesstationist) also said of Miracles "they involve supernatural, superhuman forces specifically associated with God's messengers and are not merely strange happenings, coincidences, sensational events, or natural anomalies". So...a biblical definition raises the bar a little, does'nt it? How many leg lengtheners and slayers in the spirit would meet up to that criteria? When are we going to admit that a lot of what goes on today in the name of Christ does'nt really measure up to the quality of miracle that was wrought by Christ and the Apostles?
I understand how the inclusive aspect would work with a prophetic word, but I think it would be wierd or awkward for message in tounges because that gift seems more spontaneous than other manifestations of the Spirit and that it needs to be interpreted and not always by the speaker. I think if you set a time in the service (as the Spirit leads) for people to speak forth (especially during the worship (song singing) session) that would be easier than if they had to go up and explain it and have it evaluated and such.
Good thoughts Jeff... Your class at the Ministers Enrichment in Carlisle PA the other week was also very good!!
What bugs me is when someone feels they have to use the King James language in the operation of the gifts! U-u-u-u-g-g-g-h-h-h!
Anyway---
blessings
w.g.smith
Reply to anon:
let me tone down my language a bit to become accurate.
We should celebrate answers to prayer (I used the word 'miracles'). We should celebrate genuine workings of the Holy Spirit such as an accurate life altering word of knowledge. We should celebrate life transformations such as a drug addict who is set free.
And yes, we do celebrate miracles. Do SIGN miracles happen every week? probably not in very many local churches. But should we expect the same type of 'Book Of Acts' demonstrations? I believe we should.
Do miracles still happen today? Have I witnessed them in my local church? YES.
Do I want and believe for more of the same? ABSOLUTELY.
And when the occur they should be handled with credability, integrity, all glory should go to the risen Jesus.
I hate to give an anonymous poster so much response...
that said, let's be clear on a couple points about miracles...
THEY OCCUR!!! Do they occur as often as are puported? No. Do they occur as often as the should? But...
Are we given the biblical directive to let God work through us for healings? YES!!!
I don't always understand why God heals in one circumstance, or not in another, but I do know that we are instructed to bring the sick before the church and pray for them. WOuld God have us do things with no result? No, in fact, scripture says, "...and they will be healed."
So, I would encourage you, Mr/Mrs anonymous, don't worry so much about those who appear to be cons (let God deal with them), don't worry so much about if theologians think God is active today, but follow the Holy Spirit's direction, as outlined in scripture, and see what he will do.
As far as celebrating a miracle... What I have done (I am an ordained AG senior pastor), especially in terms of healing, is talk about it in service. In my experience, God doesn't just heal on Sunday mornings or evenings at the front altar. But in homes, in hospital rooms, in cars... As pastors we hear what God has been doing during the week; we need to then share (as appropriate) with the church family. If Mr. Jones is healed of cancer on Wed, but I don't share that on Sunday morning, Mrs Smith may not have enough faith to witness to her neighbor.
Finally, if we look at the gifts in the New Testament, one strong theme we see is evangelism. My hypothesis is that we don't see miracles for a large part because we are not evangelizing.
Thanks Jeff for the post. And yes, all glory to Jesus!
Tim Hardin
Kayak Church
PS -- I am glad my parents, when doctors told them there was no hope and should go buy my casket when I was an infant, instead went to the elders of the church...
Brother Jeff,I suggest you write a book from this series because your coming at it from a point of view that in 20 years of ministry i haven't seen - most illuminating!
Ok, so I have a question. In this blog (and i am really enjoying the ability to be open and discuss these things!) you say "These nine manifestations are available to every believer at all times as needs arise. We should live in anticipation of what God will do through us."
I am not sure if you are using this definition from a resource or not, but doesn't this bring up one of our cardinal doctrines as well as what is being taught in our Bible schools? Namely, the initial physical evidence doctrine. It is taught (so i understand) that the Baptism with tongues following is the "window" through which the rest of the gifts flow. In other words the formula would be 1. Baptism 2. Tongues 3. Rest of gifts...
I am new to this so forgive me if this has been brought up already, but my concern is this: I know people (and churches) who do not subscribe to this formula and yet they flow and operate in gifts more freely and fully than most of our churches. Not to exalt experience above Scripture either, because they have a very sound Biblical argument for their position. (empowered evangelicals, Third Wave, etc.) I feel a bit like Peter standing there watching Cornelius and the gentiles of his house being filled with the Spirit and speaking in tongues when Peter had been conditioned his whole life that God simply didn't work that way. So here's a question, and forgive me if my logic is flawed, I am just trying to work through this. If our formula is broken or God is now choosing to move around it, then shouldn't we examine our formula? Should we instead emphasize the "earnestly desire spiritual gifts" and not the formula?
Hoping his credentials don't get yanked...
Eric Schall
Lead Pastor
West Shore A/G
West Shore assembly.of.god
Post a Comment